Recent searches
Search options
git blame, but it tells you who reviewed the code instead
@april Next feature request, git scapegoat.
@davidseidl
@april git blame --someone-else
@april we don’t need a feature. I already take the blame.
@april pr performance should be an explicit performance eval category for developers
@april not gonna lie that's always the second thing I check after who wrote the pr
@april starting the year with fighting talk 
@april I checked and Mozilla still requires reviewers to be listed in the commit message, at least for the mozilla-central repository. Very convenient. 
@april git blame --share-the-load
@april Tools like Gerrit automatically add the reviewers to commit messages. One surely can configure your review tool to add reviewers to the merge commit message.
@taschenorakel @april Gerrit was such a nice workflow compared to the ui/ux gitlabhub uses 
@april (it was me, I reviewed the code)
git blame origin, so that it tells you who ordered for such nonsense to be designed, coded, tested, & added.
@april
Should be "as well".
@april git shame